Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
×



Details

Submitted on
December 24, 2012
Image Size
97.4 KB
Resolution
750×600
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
1,870 (1 today)
Favourites
68 (who?)
Comments
223
Downloads
30
×
2nd Amendment by Balddog4 2nd Amendment by Balddog4
I love this Amendment. In fact I love all of the amendments. However, I love this one because it allows us to own weapons that the government have. So I can buy a tank if I want and the government can't do anything about it. Because the 2nd amendment states that I can. Now I would love to own guns, for one reason only; To protect my family. Other than that, I wouldn't use guns for any other purpose. I might go hunting, but that depends.

But I support the 2nd amendment 100% and I hate gun bans. Because if everyone is armed and allowed to carry assult weapons around where ever they go, then people wouldn't go out and shoot other people. Because then they might get shot themselves. That's why gin bans DO NOT WORK! Because all they do is allow lawless people to do whatever they want. So that is why we can not allow gun bans.
Add a Comment:
 
:iconfujin777:
Fujin777 Mar 2, 2014  New member Hobbyist Writer
I support the 2nd amendment because gun-control groups fail to see one clear fact; bad people will always get guns regardless of what happens. What needs to be fixed is the mental health system so there's less likely chances of mass shootings, but I could be wrong and that's what I think.
Reply
:iconnurseboobies:
When government takes citizen's rights to bear arms, it becomes citizen's duty to take government's right to govern - George Washington
Reply
:iconaceking90:
So you think I should own tank? Well how about a nuclear bomb or an air craft carrier?
Reply
:iconbalddog4:
The second Amendment allows us to be armed. If the government can use a tank, the citizen should be able to buy a tank. But of course buying a tank cost a lot of money. So as long you can save enough money you can buy military weapons.
Reply
:iconarkangelx120:
Well, John Wayne bought a battleship.

Of course, you need to have that kind of dough.
Reply
:iconjoshuarmour15:
joshuarmour15 Sep 5, 2013  Hobbyist Writer
I like you.
Reply
:iconaceking90:
That's insane, who would want the people who owns Wall Mart or McDonalds to be able to wage full scale war. Besides what you gun nuts always forget is that you are only allowed to bare as part of a well orginized militia.
Reply
:iconalpha-12:
Why would Walmart get tanks? They're overkill for security, are very expensive to buy and maintain plus they'd be taken out pretty quickly by the military considering DC has the luxury to take 100 percent of our pay checks if it wants too.
Regulated at the time meant equipped, and militia's are armed citizens, not the military. And I dare you to join the ATF, stack up on the doors of those who will defend their freedoms and go in first if you support gun confiscation so wholeheartedly. Sandy Hook, although a tragedy, didn't nearly kill as many people as Wounded Knee, where over 300 Indians were murdered in a gun confiscation attempt.
Reply
:iconaceking90:
No a regulated militia meant one that was ran by the state or the nation. The militia was part of the military. Also Walmart would only need a dozen or so tanks then when ever some one goes on strike and pickets in front of one of their stores they can just claims self defense and run their workers down. Secondly Wounded Knee was about removing native Americans off of their land not weapon removal. Thirdly no one is trying to take away all of your guns, just the ones you don't need and shouldn't have, like an artomatic rifle because when the second amandment was made they hide single shot weapons that took over a minuet to reload. 
Reply
:iconalpha-12:
Look it up, they were attempting to disarm the Indians first so they wouldn't resist. Also, who would want an automatic? The recoil makes it VERY hard to aim, that's why the M16 went from "rock and roll" to "3-round burst." Plus it depletes ammo very quickly, so it's just good for suppressive fire. And if you want to change the Constitution, I suggest you draft an amendment. Since the Internet wasn't around during 1775, the logical conclusion would be for the government to censor DeviantArt if it pleases.
Stalin, Hitler, Hussein, Pol Pot, Gaddafi and Mao introduced gun control-look how well that worked out.
Reply
Add a Comment: