Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour


Submitted on
January 30, 2012
Image Size
90.2 KB


1,169 (2 today)
20 (who?)
Occupied Wall Street by Balddog4 Occupied Wall Street by Balddog4
Have you guys been looking at what the Wall Street movement have been doing to the rest of the population? These people claim that they are for the 99% as said in the picture. But if they were for the 99% they would not break into building, they would not have cause violence, they would have not caused damage foo the 99% to pay for again. If you watched the news last night you would know, that in Oakland the Occupiers caused 2 million dollars worth of damage when they broke into the Mayors office, that the tax payers now must replace with our own money. They even burn the United States flag. The UNITED STATES FLAG! Come on people, you guys should know by now that the Wall Street Occupiers are NOT for the 99%. Because like I said, if they are for the 99%, then most people would be supporting their cause. But their not. The only people that are supporting the cause are people who have no life, no job and dosen't care if people are hurt, killed or miserable because of them. Those who knows this, good for you and your knowlage. Those who don't, well I sugjest looking at the movement a little bit better.
Add a Comment:
you really don't get it now do you?
The occupy movement was a fad. The real trouble has yet to come..
These guys act like they have to occupy Afghanistan. Seriously, if they hate corporations so much, don't shop at JC Penny or buy soy lattes from Starbucks!
People need to learn to take responsibility for their actions and stop blaming the system for their failures. That's all Occupy Wall Street is, blaming the system.
No what we are tring to do is change the system, so that when the 1% brakes the law they go to jail.
The difference between OWS and Tea Party? NOTHING!!
:iconhornsofhattin: you mean the people in MSNBC and elsewhere likes the Tea Party just as much as OWS?
Of course they can always abuse the First Amendment, given to them by the very country they just love to hate.
Speech is one thing, behaviour is another. I support the right of these people to their publications and web sites, which we can all read in a non-threatening environment.
But as to whether they should be able to rally and march down the roads of upset and intimidated residents is quite another question. Marches are behaviour, not pure speech.
And if they were for the 99%, they wouldn't cause so much damage that the WORKING CLASS would have to pick up. Why ask for a socialist government HERE, when there's plenty of them already made? JUST LEAVE.

Also, I compliment you for swiftly owning that Occupier in the comments. It was rather impressive.
Thanks for your comment. The guy I was arguing with was just saying the same thing over and over. I kept asking him for proof that the Occupiers ARE peaceful, but he wasn't giving me any because he knows that there aren't any good info in the first place. And the fact that he gave up, just shows you that they aren't good for the country.

Anyway onto your statement. I know, why can't they just leave. I mean if they are saying that America is a horrible place to live in, then why are they staying here? If they don't like how this country was built on then don't live here. The only reason why they aren't leaving is because deep down inside they know that the rest of the world is worst off than America. That's why they don't leave.
Add a Comment: