Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
Reagan Says... by Balddog4 Reagan Says... by Balddog4
Come on people. Do you really belive that a great man like Ronald Reagan is a Socialist Liberal? I mean, doesn't anyone know REAL history anymore? Has our education really gone downhill so fast? Well, I for one won't stand for it. I mean this is the truth people, come on! Don't let the Socialist take over your lives, fight.

Fight against the people who wanted abortion, just so they can keep the Black population under controll. Yes, people I'm serious. Abortion was introduce to keep the African Americans population from over growth. And you know which group wanted abortion? The Democrats. Yes, people the Democrats. The party that was against have Black people equal rights. The party that wants Black people to live in poverty and Welfare. And they weren't alone. No. The Socialist and Fascist that are part of the Democrats played a huge role.

And Ronald Reagan fought against them. He fought so hard that the Liberals hate him. They hate him and anyone else like him. So just think about what I just said. And if you don't belive me, look it up. I can't tell you where to find it because I don't remember where I found the infomation. But everything I said is true.

Oh, and just for you people who have seen my other motivational stuff. I won't stop from putting them up. So don't say, "Stop putting up lies." These 'lies' as you can them are the truth. And I won't stop putting them up. Freedom of Speech people. Freedom of Speech.

Thanks for looking. Oh and don't forget to comment and Fav. Thank you.
Add a Comment:
 
:icongoodthinker:
GoodThinker Featured By Owner Apr 17, 2015  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Who's been saying he was a liberal? You conservatives can keep him.
Reply
:iconimprovmanzero:
ImprovmanZero Featured By Owner Mar 1, 2015  Hobbyist General Artist
Those who do not know their history are damned to repeat its failures.
Reply
:iconsoulessone12:
soulessone12 Featured By Owner Jan 25, 2015
beliefs change with the times, for example teddy Roosevelt will be consider a democrat today due his stance on big business and the environment so who knows, maybe in 20 years what Reagan stood for will be consider something it wasn't back when he still lived 
Reply
:iconpigtailsboy:
pigtailsboy Featured By Owner Nov 27, 2014
I've come to the belief that no side is fully correct or just and that all sides in part have common ground. One problem is that politics and power are now more part of the equation. My parents think Raegan a poor president. I have little knowledge of him and his legacy. I know of one thing he shouldn't have done. But I won't call him a poor president or less of a human being. I am a liberal (I listen to all sides if I can help it) and a socialist to a degree. I don't consider any one economic or social system wrong apart from anarchy. All sides have something to bring to the table. If someone disses your president then use that diss to his advantage.

To address some statements in your entry I would want abortion for the betterment of lives, lives that are already present. I'm sure you've heard arguments for abortion before. To protect the mother, to halt an undesirable pregnancy (many reasons for this), to prevent undue suffering of the mother or the child, to better the life of one at the expense of potential life. That may not sound good but there is an obligation to those who are alive now. It isn't the best way. Birth control and abstinence would be best.

I don't want black people to live in poverty nor do my representatives where and when they exist. The issue of minority poverty and violence is complex and abortion has nothing to do with it and police action has little.

There are Progressives who happen to be Democrats who call Republicans Fascists. These people are wrong and selfish.

Democrats fight Reagen not because he did something good, but because he was a Republican trying to do good. Just as a Republican party fights against a Democrat trying to do good. It has boiled down to a point where it is more about politics and power than it ever should have been. I'm not blind to that and I don't consider you or wrong or right... just at odds in some ways. This is where compromise is required.

Try not to use this one side and the other side to help prove the other side wrong.
Reply
:iconwaffenschmidt:
waffenschmidt Featured By Owner Sep 12, 2014
He's very photogenic
Reply
:iconcrimsonfalke:
CrimsonFALKE Featured By Owner Jun 15, 2014  Hobbyist Digital Artist
He demanded Hollywood make positive roles for black men to look up too
Reply
:iconmissmuffintop:
MissMuffinTop Featured By Owner Jun 14, 2014   Writer
He wasn't as fat-right as people say he was. That doesn't mean he wasn't a hard-core right-winger, I'm saying that he wouldn't cut it in today's Republican party. 

It might make it easier to prove where his ideology was if everyone stopped mythologizing him, but that's just my perspective. 
Reply
:iconmornofvivec:
MornofVivec Featured By Owner Feb 1, 2014
It wasn't abortion that was introduced to keep black populations down, it was contraception.
Reply
:iconarmandacyd:
Armandacyd Featured By Owner Nov 29, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
I saw his videos on youtube! A great and true American!
Reply
:icon96keyblade:
96keyblade Featured By Owner Jun 30, 2013
Good stuff man. Continue to question authority.
Reply
:iconjoeisbadass:
joeisbadass Featured By Owner Jun 18, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
If Reagan is a socialist then Obama is a conservative, which the idiotic liberals also say is true.
Reply
:iconjoeisbadass:
joeisbadass Featured By Owner Jun 18, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Their problem is that they hate republican presidents until society and history smile on them. Then they'll be like "OH! That guy's one of us!" The opposite also applies, with presidents who democrats like, unless they lose their popularity. Then they'll turn around and say the president belongs to the enemy. It's one of the least consistent things in American politics. If Iraq becomes democratic and so then the rest of the middle east begins to follow, George Bush will be looked at as a great president. You know what's gonna happen after that.
Reply
:iconawb2012:
AWB2012 Featured By Owner Jan 28, 2013
THE GREATEST PRESIDENT OF THE 20TH CENTURY, BESIDES BUSH SR AND BUSH JUNIOR!!! NO DEBATING ME ON THAT!!!!!!!!!
Reply
:iconstarshipcaptainroehm:
StarshipCaptainRoehm Featured By Owner Mar 12, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Bush Junior sucked majorly, sorry....The Iraq War and the huge debt are proof of it, Obama is just continuing it with his POS non-governing...governing

And democrats.......well democrats would see this country go extinct
Reply
:iconbalddog4:
Balddog4 Featured By Owner Jan 29, 2013
I'm not going to , because I feel the same.
Reply
:iconsupermanfan01:
supermanfan01 Featured By Owner Jan 19, 2013
Ronald Reagan was one of the greatest men to ever come from our great nation!
Reply
:iconbalddog4:
Balddog4 Featured By Owner Jan 19, 2013
True, very true.
Reply
:iconelijahcurtis:
ElijahCurtis Featured By Owner Jan 18, 2013  Student General Artist
Reagan layed the smackdown on the liberal agenda. He not only disagreed, but challenged their thinking with pure common sense. He didn't try to tiptoe around the problems, he faced them head on. Not alot of recent Presidents have showed that bravery since.....

God Bless America.
Reply
:iconbalddog4:
Balddog4 Featured By Owner Jan 19, 2013
That's why I want to run for president. I understand what needs to be done. In fact I can do more in four years as president, than Obama will ever do in eight years.
Reply
:iconpigtailsboy:
pigtailsboy Featured By Owner Nov 27, 2014
Keep that in mind in twenty five years. I'd make some suggestions but I'm not sure they would help.
Reply
:icon96keyblade:
96keyblade Featured By Owner Jun 30, 2013
I hope you do more if you become elected. Your country may need it.
Reply
:iconelijahcurtis:
ElijahCurtis Featured By Owner Jan 19, 2013  Student General Artist
The people know what's right for the people....
Reply
:iconrogersusa:
rogersusa Featured By Owner Oct 1, 2012
Well Said! Keep up the good work!
Reply
:iconbalddog4:
Balddog4 Featured By Owner Oct 5, 2012
Thanks.
Reply
:iconarchangel4282:
Archangel4282 Featured By Owner Feb 25, 2012
What's funny as hell is that today, Reagan would be Left of Center.
Reply
:iconpigtailsboy:
pigtailsboy Featured By Owner Nov 27, 2014
I suppose you could say something similar of many of commander and chiefs. Nixon and Theodore Roosevelt were in part both progressive and conservative. What's not funny is the incredible divergence of opinion and trust between the major parties in the last... four decades? Nixon may have been a great president but he damaged his party and relationships between it and the Democrats. It wasn't absolute but it does mark one point in which the political cultures stood in opposition to each other.

One thing that upsets me is that Republicans in certain circles are distancing them selves from some of their best leaders of past generations (Roosevelt and Nixon as examples) for the reasons that their actions then are more in line with progressive and as it happens progressive conservative actions. I would worry if and when will it be before the Republican party officially distances it self from TR and in time distances the party from Lincoln due to their standings on states rights. I can't imagine it would be an easy road to such a point.
Reply
:iconkraeten:
Kraeten Featured By Owner Jan 29, 2012
What a scary world it must be for you, you poor deluded little fool. You think socialists are trying to take over your life? You think they are trying to rewrite history? You are out of your mind.
Reply
:iconbalddog4:
Balddog4 Featured By Owner Jan 30, 2012
THEY ARE REWRITTING HISTORY! God, you must so simple minded to think that Socialist aren't even touching the history books. Did you even look at the curriculum for the schools now and compare them to the past curriculum? If you did you'll see that things are being change by the people who are in charge of the schools all across of America. Those people are socialist who wants to brainwash students so that when they come out of school they will be their puppets.
Reply
:iconpigtailsboy:
pigtailsboy Featured By Owner Nov 27, 2014
At this late date maybe you're not reading comments here anymore. But read this fully before you start ranting.

Now you're just a driveling idiot. I'm not sure what changes you speak of but by in large changes to education have a beneficial aim. Ideology may be involved but so are children, parents, teachers, administrators, district employees, city and state governments, federal policies... and you think that even with all those involved forces that a conspiracy to corrupt the path of a nation and it's populous is in effect. I would site that the youth movement of the 60's happened in spite of government intervention, in spite of education, in spite of parents. What happened then was a legitimate response to events of the decades. I would also believe that the content of an education isn't enough to shape an individuals thoughts and ideas. Mine were shaped at school, yes, but also by students and how they treated me, my understanding of the role of government, my upbringing under my parents (where your view probably come from most of all), events made public in the media. If you want to prevent children from being made into puppets you have to keep them away from media and steal them away from their parents... then maybe schools might have the kind of effect you image they're having.

Not to mention proper history, the history that happened is being unveiled all time, good or bad, undigestible or not. True history as it happened is almost impossible to pass on in an unbiased fashion. But that doesn't mean we don't try and that doesn't mean we like it. I know and believe the United States practiced genocide and unwarranted warfare. I don't like that but I accept it. But I'm at least willing to mention an example. You are foaming at the mouth over how outrageous it is that someone is reacting to either a troll image or obvious bait to start an argument. Maybe you didn't want an argument? Maybe you expected everyone who posted would agree with you and that differing opinions were a minority or an urban legend? But more importantly I'm just wondering what kind of dangerous material we're spoon feeding young people in schools? I'd like an example... many examples of how my schools (I and we pay for them) are harming children in an ideological sense?
Reply
:icongmartini42:
gmartini42 Featured By Owner Feb 1, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Keep up the good work! It truly is sad how many people just take what the schools and media spoon feed them. Is "question authority" just a bumper sticker now that the progressives are the ones in authority?
Reply
:iconbalddog4:
Balddog4 Featured By Owner Feb 1, 2012
Umm...Are you agreeing with what I said? Or are you taunting me?
Reply
:icongmartini42:
gmartini42 Featured By Owner Feb 15, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
I was agreeing with you, if I understood correctly that you like Reagan. Reagan was a great President. He wasn't perfect, as no one is, but he came closest to any President I can think of.
Reply
:iconbalddog4:
Balddog4 Featured By Owner Feb 16, 2012
Aw, okay. I just wanted to make sure. Because it's hard to figure out if someone is taunting you on the internet.
Reply
:iconxarti:
Xarti Featured By Owner Jan 18, 2012  Student General Artist
:)
Reply
:icondingoslayer:
DingoSlayer Featured By Owner Oct 31, 2011  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Ronald Reagan is considered one of the worst presidents we've ever had. He put the country through ridiculous economic plans that cut the taxes of the wealthiest, sent the country into insane debt, fucked with Afghanistan, etc. [link]
By the way, this poster fails hard. "Nor did he do the things with the Liberal Media said he did."
Reply
:iconpigtailsboy:
pigtailsboy Featured By Owner Nov 27, 2014
I would assume that Reagan on some level thought his actions would bare more fruit than it did. Another thing that prevents any one policy based on ideology from proving one path right or wrong is how long it has to work in as well as what party is in power. We assume trickle down economics was a failure and in many ways it is if you consider how many companies choose to balance profit distribution. Some may claim even then that that is proper because those who improperly balance profits in favor of fewer individuals will share that through tax or spending. But there are many who just take that and reinvest in things that only effect them or they sit on their wealth allowing it to build. When the wealthy spend what they spend on may not affect me as one of their employees or even the environment I live in. This is the argument against that system, it's reliant on human generosity and an understanding that no one goes it alone.
Reply
:iconbalddog4:
Balddog4 Featured By Owner Oct 31, 2011
That infomation isn't worth a cent. "Reagan traded arms, money, drugs and hostages between Iran and the Nicaraguan rebels. Reagan showed no leadership and ignored AIDS — the biggest health crisis of the century — while tens-of-thousands of people died." I mean this infomation is worthless. I mean AIDS?! What does that have to do with Reagan's Presidency? Huh? Answer that will you. What did AIDS have to do with Reagan's Presidency? "Reagan sent the deficit skyrocketing, growing faster in real dollars than under any other president, including Obama." I know that's false. "Reagan cut school funding and tried to classify ketchup as a vegetable." Yeah. That infomation is really worth something. "Reagan gave chemical weapons to Saddam Hussein." *scoff*Yeah, and I'm a freaking terrorist. That's sarcasm, I'm just showing you how unbelievable it is. "Reagan banned the Beach Boys —THE BEACH BOYS!— as attracting the wrong sort of crowd." Okay that is false right there. It wasn't Reagan who banned them it was James G. Watt, Ronald Reagan's Secretary of the Interior. Ronald Reagan was a fan of the Beach Boys. "Reagan claimed “Trees cause more pollution than automobiles do.”' Okay that's it I'm done. These infomation is worth NOTHING! N-O-T-H-I-N-G! Nothing! THese are just stright out lies. I mean who even wrote this crap? I'm serious, who wrote this crap? None of these infomation are truth. They are flat out lies. Why would you belive what that person says when it's completly full of lies?
Reply
:iconpigtailsboy:
pigtailsboy Featured By Owner Nov 27, 2014
Depends on how you read into what a president should be doing I would suppose. If you look at today we have an explosion of the Ebola virus overseas that is an indirect threat to the health and life of many people around the globe. Many governments including our own are trying to respond to it. While I don't know what the Reagan administration's policy was in regards to AIDs I would wonder if it was appropriate. At the time many groups and individuals distanced them selves wholly from Gays and claimed that it was a righteous retribution being dealt to a morally broken group of people. If the government at the time chose to lean towards that kind of thinking then that would prove a valid point. People were afraid. But people are afraid now and even with differing opinions much of what needs to be done to save lives and societies is being done. You can't deny that we failed a great many individuals because we hated who they were 30 years ago. Even the Gay community failed it self I understand.

I do recall the ketchup vegetable thing though. Tomatoes are a fruit but that's besides the point. Our government officials get some stupid ideas some times. I'm not sure where this one came from though.

Our government regardless of party rule has assisted many morally questionable people on many occasions. Reagan is no different I'm sure. It suited his or our ends at the time.

Most of us aren't siting evidence and irrefutable truths to support our arguments or claims. I'm not. I'm not patient enough to do so and I imagine neither are you. And if either of us was willing we have sources available to us biased or not that would help support our arguments. That would not however help in swaying or convincing anyone who's already made up their mind. I would say that there are differences between they various presidents worth pointing out. But that doesn't change that when you seek the presidency you more often than not are a certain kind of person. You have goals and those goals aren't often selfish.
Reply
:iconvicariousviewer:
VicariousViewer Featured By Owner Oct 31, 2011
Someone's been reading Ann Coulter...
Reply
:iconbalddog4:
Balddog4 Featured By Owner Oct 31, 2011
I haven't been reading anything on Ann Coulter. In fact I didn't even know who she was until you mention her. I'm just saying that what the Democrats are saying about Reagan is false and that he didn't do the things which he did for his own gain.
Reply
:iconvicariousviewer:
VicariousViewer Featured By Owner Oct 31, 2011
I have no disagreement about Reagan, he was as conservative as they come and I have no idea why any Liberal would even want to claim him as one of their own; he did some horrible, evil things. I was referring to your statements about abortion, they're nothing short of a slanderous conspiracy theory.
Reply
:iconbalddog4:
Balddog4 Featured By Owner Oct 31, 2011
Well what I said about abortion is the truth. It just you don't hear a lot about it because the Liberals want to keep people from the truth. They don't want to admit to their Black voters that it was their intent to controll their population. Also it was the Liberal Democrats that was against the civil rights movement for the Blacks.
Reply
:iconvicariousviewer:
VicariousViewer Featured By Owner Oct 31, 2011
You say what you claim is the truth, I say it's nothing more than a slanderous conspiracy theory, therefore we are at an impasse unless you, the one who is making the claim, can provide evidence to support your claim. Oddly enough you are right about the Democrats being against the civil rights movement, although opposition to it hardly qualifies them as liberal, in the sense of the word.
Reply
:iconmalduki:
Malduki Featured By Owner Jan 1, 2012   Traditional Artist
I must confess, I dig digress from the topic at hand. Ronald Reagan has done more(positive at least) for our country then Obama has ever done in his presidency. He brought down the Russian empire of communism for 1, while Obama ignored the opportunity to confront tyrants like Akmadimishan (not how it's spelled, but bear with me). Second, he actually allowed for an economy where the wealthy and earning could dwell (tell me why it is bad to be rich, for all I know you could get rich soon enough), whereas Obama funded measures that would steal money from the rich even when they have owned it. And finally, Reagan didn't force a system of management down our throats, unlike Obama who openly forced Gov't operated (and monopolistic) healthcare down people's throats.
Reply
:iconmalduki:
Malduki Featured By Owner Jan 1, 2012   Traditional Artist
Look up "Margrett Sanger", the founder of Planned Parenthood. Then look up "Racist" with it. She had plenty of publicity about her intentions for Planned Parenthood, and she wan't shy either. Even today you'll find the correlation between abortions and African American populations. I believe what they say is that for every two babies (AA) born, one dies upon a "surgical procedure" to "cease the function of the fetus".

Interesting how Abortionist use all of these funny terms and wording for a procedure as obvious as Abortion. You should ask yourself why they word it like this as well. Is it because they are trying to avoid publicity by saying "a surgical procedure" instead of "abort a fetus", or that they are blind to death as only to call it a harmless "procedure"?
Reply
:iconbladercomedyteam:
bladercomedyteam Featured By Owner Oct 17, 2011   General Artist
Pretty sure if Regan ran today you conservatives wouldn't like him.
Reply
:iconbalddog4:
Balddog4 Featured By Owner Oct 18, 2011
So pretty much you belive what the Democrats say about Reagan, right?
Reply
:iconyourheadasplode414:
YourHeadaSplode414 Featured By Owner Oct 18, 2011  Hobbyist Photographer
:iconcoolstorybroplz:
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×


More from DeviantArt



Details

Submitted on
October 14, 2011
Image Size
82.5 KB
Resolution
750×600
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
2,852 (4 today)
Favourites
35 (who?)
Comments
48
Downloads
16
×